|
|
研究组织
研究小组负责人
- Yoshihiro Nishiaki, Professor,
Prehistoric Archaeology, The University Museum, The University of Tokyo
合作调查者
- Hirofumi Kato, Professor, North Eurasian Archaeology,
North Eurasian Archaeology, University Center for Ainu and Indigenous Studies, Hokkaido University
- Seiji Kadowaki, Assistant Professor,
West Asian Archaeology, The Nagoya University Museum, Nagoya University
- Akira Ono, Professor,
European Archaeology, Center for Obsidian and Lithic Studies, Meiji University
- Katsuhiko Ohnuma, Emeritus Professor,
Lithic Technology, Institute for Cultural Studies of Ancient Iraq, Kokushikan University
- Naoko Matsumoto, Professor,
Cognitive Archaeology, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Okayama University
- Jun Takakura, Assistant Professor,
Japanese Archaeology, Archaeological Research Center, Hokkaido University
- Katsuhiro Sano, Assistant Professor,
European Archaeology, The University Museum, The University of Tokyo
- Masaki Naganuma, Assistant Professor,
North Eurasian Archaeology, Hokkaido University Center for Ainu and Indigenous Studies, Hokkaido University
- Hiroto Nakata, Lecturer,
Paleolithic Archaeology, College of Literature, Aoyama Gakuin University
- Kenji Nagai, Lecturer,
Tohoku University of Art And Design
- Yasuhisa Kondo, Associate Professor,
Informatics, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature
- Ryota Ishii, Assistant Professor,
Ethnoarchaeology, Faculty of Business Administration, Josai University
海外合作者
- Olaf Jöris,
Forschungsbereich Altsteinzeit des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, Germany
邀请研究员
- Yasuo Higurashi, Postdoctoral Fellow,
Faculty of Medicine, Physiological Sciences, Kinki University
研究目的:
学习（教育）是左右人类生存战略的决定性因素。考古资料是传达史前时代学习行为的唯一物证。本组的研究目的在于通过搜集和分析考古学证据，从而实证性地解析古人和新人在学习行为方面的差异。对曾为学习场所的遗址构造以及作为学习产物的石器制造传统的时空分布和荣衰模式进行复原和分析，实证性地再次构筑两者的学习行为。根据其差异，有助于构筑基于学习假说的古人和新人交替剧模型。
研究方法
以欧亚大陆西半区域交替期的旧石器时代遗迹和遗物作为材料，进行以下研究。(1) 对古人和新人遗迹生活圈中的石器分布构造以及制造传统的历时变化进行分析，提出证明两者间存在学习行为差异的物证。(2)搜集并分析交替期遗迹的文献数据，在石器制造传统的荣衰模式、时空分布方式、新传统的出现契机等文化传播继承、创造行为相关物证方面对古人和新人进行比较。(3)实施石器制造实验，实证性地解析学习行为和石器制造传统形成过程的相互作用。古人和新人在技术的教授方法上可能存在差异，实验的焦点在于社会学习的内容差异。(4)根据以上研究结果，明确两者学习行为的性质和差异，论述古人和新人之间出现技术差异、产生交替剧的原理。
|
|
|
